So what is goodness? And who is good? Is Robin Hood good? I guess it depends on whether you are a friend of the Sheriff or not!
In the last few weeks, I have been in a space where I had some tough choices to make about people and issues. Should I necessarily trash someone because he has had a murky past even if he has a side to them that fuels a kind of development in society that one hasnt seen before? Or should I learn to ignore his follies and violent past and appreciate him for the side that is positive? Not easy, especially when emotions run high and you are dealing with someone who has been impacted by the gory past.
But I have also realised then the importance of being non-judgemental and taking a stand, sometimes even if is against popular sentiment is important if one has to look at solutions and move on. Because life is always grey. And it cannot always be judged in black or white.
Is Arundhati Roy to be admired for giving a voice to the Maoists who questionably haven’t had any other means but violence to protest against the state’s apathy or be rapped for misusing the freedom the state has given her by cloaking half-truths and presenting only one side of the picture? Should the Mahatma’s murder be condoned just because one group of society felt that he compromised India’s position with the British on the issue of Partition?
The thing is I like Arundhati Roy for her writing. I admire her ability to weave words into sheer poetry and her clarity of thought when she pens an essay. But I can’t stand the fact that she is OK with the brutal murder of human beings just because they have a CRPF uniform on them, in the name of justice. So is she good or bad?
I adore the Mahatma. He was a man like no other. And even after reading his autobiography for the third time in ten years, I never cease to be amazed at his foresight and courage, and get mesmerised by his thinking all over again. But did he delay India’s independence when he agreed with the Brits to postpone the talks until after the Second World War was over in 1939? Perhaps. Would that have had an impact on what India could have been. Surely. Is he a bad leader then?
Maybe not.
The thing I have come to realise is that there is good and bad in everyone, even in the best of men. It’s unfair to be judgemental about people because there will always be another side of the coin that tells a different story. A man like Nobel who gave the worst kind of destructive tools to the world also made it possible for champions of peace to be recognised.
I have come to realise that the beauty of life is in the appreciation of the greys. For every black there is a measure of white. And its ok to have an opinion that is not extreme all the time. That it is fine to hate and like the same person for different aspects that they bring to fore.
Unless of course, it is a Suresh Kalmadi!
Archive for the ‘music lessons’ category
Appreciating the beauty of greys
September 24th, 2010An early example of “glocalisation”
March 16th, 2008I have been singing since the age of 4, and have trained in Carnatic classical vocal music for over 15 years. But it wasn’t until this evening in Chennai when I begun to think about the how the violin, an instrument of European descent, has transformed itself into being a mainstay in orthodox Carnatic classical music over the years!! Come to think of it, it is not the first and has not been the last musical instrument that is not of Indian origin to have adapted to the Indian classical scene, be it Hindustani or Carnatic styles, but is by far the only one that has not only withstood the test of times and resistance, but has in fact become the mainstay of a traditional classical performance.
Subsequent research led to me to understand that the violin was first introduced in the court of Travancore during the regime of Maharajah Swati Tirunal. The violin in its advent to India was a direct import from the European make by way of its shape but differed in execution and presentation, adapting itself to the style of presentation in Indian music. There were a few adventurous and gifted musicians of the 18th and 19th Centuries who are credited with the introduction of the violin in India. Of them, Vadivelu and Baluswami Dikshitar were perhaps the pioneers. Introduced by Manali Muthukrishna Mudaliar (an interpreter to the British Governor) to Western music at a performance of the European orchestra (or band as it was called), attached to the East India Company, Balaswami trained for three years on the violin.
I also learnt that around the time that the violin made its humble trysts with Indian classical music, there were also attempts made by some well known musicians of that time to introduce the piano with its seven octaves to this genre. But many of that brigade settled down to learn the violin, which they felt could be best adapted to Carnatic music traditions. You could not play gamaka on a piano.
The person who really popularised the violin to the extent that it became a totally accepted instrument in the rendition of Carnatic music was Vadivelu (1810-1845), of the Tanjore Quartet (all of whom were students of Muthuswami Dikshitar). Vadivelu had the good fortune of being appointed as the royal bard in the court of the composer-king Swati Tirunal. His encouragement and patronage saw the violin being performed not only as an accompaniment to the voice, but also as an instrument that even played solo passages during a dance performance.
Significantly, in spite of being a Western instrument with technique developed to suit playing Western classical music, the instrument could be adapted to the needs of Carnatic music. Many Western techniques redundant in Carnatic music were simply overlooked and later discarded.
The first of these was the basic way the violin was tuned, held and played. Carnatic music required the violinist to sit cross-legged on a platform. The violin was, therefore, balanced between the chest and the scroll held by the anklebone of the right foot. The posture felicitated the free flow of the left hand along the fingerboard. This necessitated appropriate changes in the bowing technique, which were duly innovated. Western techniques like colegnio (using the wooden side of the bow instead of the horse hair), marcellato (hammering), and even pizzicato (plucking) were not of much use to the Indian violinist.
We could perhaps say that the story of the adaptation of the violin from being a stylish European instrument to one that has become an essential part of a traditional Indian culture is one of the early examples of “glocalisation” in the truest sense!!!!
Innocence in music- revisited…
March 16th, 2008I was in Chennai a few days back. After a rather hectic day at work (and some very stressful meetings), it seemed divine to be at a nice carnatic music concert in a temple close to where I was staying. It was a 2-hr concert by Soumya, a pretty famous “star performer” in carnatic music circles. While I had heard her before, what I wasn’t prepared for was the ambience created by the powerful voice, the echoing columns of the Rathnagireeswara temple, the small but very appreciative audience and some outstanding music. A rare opportunity to listen to pure music sans any commercialism or sensationalism. No fancy standees welcoming or barricades dividing the music lovers basis their monetary status, nor a blaring 2000 watt sound system blaring. It was a musical experience that I had thought had become rather extinct! At the end of the two hours, I hardly remembered that I hadn’t eaten much all day and was almost starving, not to mention the stress at work. All I remember is the innocence of the performance and the soulfulness with which the musicians (the vocalist, and her accompaniments, a violinist and a percussionist on the mridangam) performed, not mindful of the fact that the audience comprised of hardly 40-50 people, mostly in their 60s. I felt like the purity of music and the purpose with which it existed among us was truly experienced at that time. For a long time, after the concert was over, I enjoyed the humility the evening had instilled in me!!!!